

NOTE from LiesHunter.Com Editors: Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump: “The only person who may be worse than weak on violent crime A.G. Letitia “Peekaboo” James, is the Judge we have on her ridiculous & highly partisan case against me & my family. His name is Arthur Engoron, & he is a vicious, biased, and mean “rubber stamp” for the Communist takeover of the great & prosperous American company that I have built over a long period of years. He was appointed by my worst enemies. Case was to go to a new Judge, but he demands to keep it. I have no jury or Civil Rights!” Oct 28, 2022, 10:09 AM
Article from: NYPost.Com
By Priscilla DeGregory, June 5, 2019
A Manhattan judge slammed city lawyers Wednesday after a marathon of hearings about controversial plans to add luxury high-rise apartment buildings to the Two Bridges housing development downtown.
Justice Arthur Engoron said city lawyers seem to think, “we can do pretty much anything we want because zoning allows it. I just can’t believe that’s the case.”
Dozens of opponents of the project who showed up to Manhattan Supreme Court Wednesday cheered and clapped at Engoron’s words.
City lawyers spent the day arguing that the City Planning Commission’s move to approve the project to add four buildings — all 60 stories and up — didn’t require a public review process with the City Council and the Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer.
City lawyer Rachel Moston said the CPC doesn’t “have a dog in this fight.”
“What they [CPC] did was interpret the provisions in the New York City Charter. They came out that ULURP [Uniform Land Use Review Procedure] was simply not required,” Moston added.
“I like housing, but I don’t see that this can be built without … City Council having a say in this,” Engoron added.
“The magnitude and physical size of the building don’t matter,” a lawyer for the developers of the project, Janice Macavoy, said later to groans from the audience.
Engoron chimed in, “Size is the 800-pound gorilla in the courtroom.”
But Macavoy responded that “zoning does not restrict the height.”

Original full information
Judge slams city lawyers pushing new Two Bridges high-rise buildings
A Manhattan judge slammed city lawyers Wednesday after a marathon of hearings about controversial plans to add luxury high-rise apartment buildings to the Two Bridges housing development downtown.
Justice Arthur Engoron said city lawyers seem to think, “we can do pretty much anything we want because zoning allows it. I just can’t believe that’s the case.”
Dozens of opponents of the project who showed up to Manhattan Supreme Court Wednesday cheered and clapped at Engoron’s words.
City lawyers spent the day arguing that the City Planning Commission’s move to approve the project to add four buildings — all 60 stories and up — didn’t require a public review process with the City Council and the Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer.
City lawyer Rachel Moston said the CPC doesn’t “have a dog in this fight.”
“What they [CPC] did was interpret the provisions in the New York City Charter. They came out that ULURP [Uniform Land Use Review Procedure] was simply not required,” Moston added.
“I like housing, but I don’t see that this can be built without … City Council having a say in this,” Engoron added.
“The magnitude and physical size of the building don’t matter,” a lawyer for the developers of the project, Janice Macavoy, said later to groans from the audience.
Engoron chimed in, “Size is the 800-pound gorilla in the courtroom.”
But Macavoy responded that “zoning does not restrict the height.”
Earlier in the day City Council lawyer Debra Greenberger said, “What is important is that there are negotiations.” She said this will provide accountability, transparency on issues such as trying to mitigate the environmental impact of the project.
Three lawsuits were brought against the city and the CPC by local residents, the City Council and Brewer to block the project — which would add nearly 3,000 units to the area — until it’s put through public review.
The new buildings will have 694 affordable housing units — 25% of the total.
Engoron continued a temporary restraining order halting the plans until he issues a written order in early August.
After, a Two Bridges resident, Grace Mak, said she was one of the people that clapped at the judge’s words.
“We were totally absolutely relieved because the developers didn’t think we had a winning chance,” Mak, 45, said.
“All we wanted was a fair public equitable review to stop these developers from robbing the community,” Mak said, by constructing the buildings without mitigating possible displacement of the current residents and a loss of open spaces.
Related article by Priscilla DeGregory
LES residents, activists sue to block additions to Two Bridges buildings
Lower East Side residents and activists have filed two lawsuits to try to block three new buildings from being added to the massive Two Bridges housing development downtown.
The new Manhattan Supreme Court lawsuits piggy-back on one the City Council brought last year against the city’s own Department of Planning for approving the nearly 3,000 additional housing units.
“That neighborhood is going to get massacred. These buildings should not be given permission to go ahead,’’ said Ken Kimerling, a lawyer for one of the groups.
A lawyer in the other suit, Paula Segal, said she expects more cases will be filed because of the “huge … outcry against these proposed megatowers, which were approved using an illegal process that violates both state environmental review law and our cities zoning laws.”
Nick Paolucci, a rep for the city Law Department, said, “The city stands by its review and approvals for this project, which is expected to add hundreds of affordable housing units and improve transit infrastructure for the community.”
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
LiesHunter.Com do not necessarily shares the views of the writings an images it publish from other sources of information. Please, visit the article source for more information.